Why Apple’s Dual Core Processor Is Better Than Android’s Octa?
The fact is that the dual core processor in the iPhone 6 is the fastest mobile processor in the world right now is a major reason why Apple’s dual core processor is better than android’s octa. The A8 processor, which has two cores and also runs at 1.4 GHz, in the iPhone 6 has more speed than the Qualcomm Snapdragon 805, which is the fastest smartphone processor available for Android phones, even when the Snapdragon 805 has four cores and runs at a speed of about 2.7GHz.
The main reason “why Apple’s dual core processor is better than android’s octa” processors is due to the fact Apple has made the proper selections (and also the right compromises) in the design of its processors while in the Android world, corporations are only chasing after the core count.
Android phones use ‘off the shelf’ SOCs for the most part. When HTC makes a phone, they do not have the vertical integration that Apple has, so they have to purchase something from the market to use for their phone.
The closest relation to Apple is Samsung, and as it stands, they often swap places with the performance lead, albeit with somewhat exceptional methodologies. Samsung’s recent Exynos is a faster chip than the A8 Apple makes use of and of course, it is 8 cores – however, 4 of the cores are low power, reduced performance cores which are utilized for less demanding situations, and the remaining 4 cores are higher performance. They are not used at the same time.
Other reasons Why Apple’s Dual Core Processor Is Better Than Android’s Octa.
Apple, being heavily vertically integrated is using their own CPU layout, which enables them to choose exactly whatever they want in the chip. That a dual-core chip can compete with an 8 core chip is amazing. To oversimplify, those 8 core chips are really 4 core chips in terms of true available computing power.
Apple’s design would not run at 2.4GHz. It is not constructed for it and likely couldn’t within the thermal constraints of a smartphone – or probably even tablets. It gets more jobs done per clock cycle; the CPU die area is likely to be substantially larger to be able to achieve it.
Nobody thinking properly would equal a 2.4GHz Intel Atom to a 1.2GHz i5 core, even as the former has more CPU cores than the later. That is an exaggeration of the point; however, the bottom line is that the different CPUs are simply exclusive designs and are intended to work at different expected frequencies. Again, the 8 core CPUs are merely set up to have lower and higher power units because the cost of putting them the SOC die is close to zero.